Author: adler

The Trump administration needs to take a hard look at what Keir Starmer’s Labour government is doing right now. Banning Americans from entering the UK purely because of their political opinions sets a dangerous precedent — and it’s happening right before Tommy Robinson’s next major “Unite the Kingdom” rally in central London on 16 May.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has already canceled the Electronic Travel Authorizations for four invited international speakers: American commentators Joey Mannarino and Valentina Gomez, Spain’s Ada Lluch, and Dutch activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek.
The official excuse is that their presence “would not be conducive to the public good.” In reality, ministers are terrified these voices will stand with Tommy and speak plainly about grooming gangs, mass immigration, and Labour’s two-tier policing.
Joey Mannarino is that straight-shooting American conservative commentator with a big X following. He pulls no punches on borders, free speech, and cultural breakdown – proper MAGA energy – and he’s spoken at UK events before without toning it down for anyone.
Valentina Gomez, a Colombian-born real estate investor and Republican activist, has blown up online with her no-nonsense videos tearing into woke culture, school grooming, and open borders. Her fiery take on Islam and immigration has won her a big following among populists on both sides of the pond.
Ada Lluch is a sharp young Spanish influencer in her mid-20s who has become a strong voice for national identity and protecting Europe’s future. She made her debut at an earlier Unite the Kingdom rally and speaks with real passion about demographic change.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek, the Dutch lawyer and activist often called the “shieldmaiden of the right,” doesn’t hold back on mass migration or the erosion of Western civilization. She’s spoken at big conservative events across Europe and the US and has already been targeted by the UK government for criticizing Starmer.
Other speakers include Laurence Fox, women’s rights campaigner Kellie-Jay Keen (Posie Parker), NHS whistleblower Gary Harvey, former MP Andrew Bridgen, and American broadcaster Glenn Beck. Tommy Robinson will host and speak.
I’ve had the privilege of speaking at two previous Unite the Kingdom rallies, and they’ve been massive. The last one in September 2025 drew up to a million people — the biggest gathering in modern UK history. That turnout shows the depth of frustration the establishment just can’t ignore.
Tommy’s recent US trip earlier this year was a massive success after years of visa headaches. He appeared on Alex Jones (Infowars), Glenn Beck, Patrick Bet-David, Jack Posobiec, PragerU, OAN and more, met State Department officials, briefed Congress, and connected with Mike Flynn. It proved his growing influence on the American right — and clearly spooked Starmer’s team.
The desperate decision to block international guests while the rally still goes ahead with this strong lineup shows how nervous they are.
Tommy’s real impact has always been exposing the grooming gang scandals in places like Rotherham and Rochdale, where authorities looked the other way. His refusal to stay silent draws huge crowds demanding secure borders, real integration, and actual free speech.
This visa clampdown proves Starmer’s weakness. The ETA system, sold as a simple entry, is now a political filter. A confident government debates critics. A failing one bans them.
Americans should watch this closely. The same tactics — smear border concerns as “extremism,” change demographics, then shut down dissent — are being tested here. If Labour can cancel visas over polite disagreement, free speech gets smothered fast.
The 16 May rally will still happen under a heavy police presence. But the bans send a clear message: this government prefers silence over honest debate.
Britain needs straight talk on immigration, protection for vulnerable girls, and real free speech. Tommy Robinson keeps forcing that conversation. The canceled visas only prove why his message hits home.
The post Trump Should Step In: Starmer’s UK is Banning Americans for Political Views Ahead of Tommy Robinson Rally appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

There is an ongoing case in Michigan that should terrify everyone. Marc Aisen was arrested near his home in December of 2023, extradited to Michigan, and has been held pretrial for over two and a half years.
Most Americans don’t believe the system can be weaponized against ordinary citizens. Judges and prosecutors are given the presumption of innocence and good faith, while criminal defendants are given the presumption of guilt because, “if the government went after them, they must have done something wrong.”
The case of The People of Michigan v. Marc Aisen demonstrates just how far the system can crush a person with the process.
Marc Aisen was gainfully employed and lived independently in Massachusetts. In his spare time, he did what countless Americans have done for generations: he wrote messages to politicians, nonprofit boards, and charity officials, on behalf of himself and others, calling them out for what he sincerely believed was complicity in crimes, immorality, and threats to public safety. He volunteered with various organizations within his religious community and the parents’ rights movement to advocate for policies.
On July 26, 2023, from his apartment in Massachusetts, Aisen sent an email to Bloomfield Township, Michigan, Treasurer Michael Schostak. The subject line was: “Michael Schostak Covered Up Child Sexual Exploitation in Jewish Nonprofit.”  The email was not posted on social media. It was sent directly to 56 email addresses, including 23 official local government emails, 14 officials from community boards and homeowners associations, and 19 private individuals. Here is the full text of that July 26 email:
Michael Schostak’s pedophile buddies are recommending child sex “change” experiments to kids and their parents, bespoking their tiny bodies with genital mutilation to make them more sexually appealing to the gay predators they are introducing them to. Michael Schostak is personally complicit in this evil scheme through his role at the “Secure Communities Network”. He doesn’t deny it. They advertise it on the JewishBoston.com website. “Jewish?” No. Faggotry is against the Jewish religion and this is precisely why.
Schostak received the email and forwarded it to Bloomfield Township Police Chief James Gallagher with the message: “Another email this morning. What are my options here?”
The “option” Schostak chose should alarm every American. On official township letterhead, using his government email address and cc’ing the police chief and a sergeant, Schostak sent Aisen this letter:
Mr. Aisen,
This letter serves as formal notice to cease and desist from any communication to me, my family, my colleagues, constituents or other associates. Your email messages are vile, contain hateful language, and are completely detached from any basis in fact. To be clear, I unequivocally deny your allegations as untrue and defamatory. You are hereby on notice to cease all communications to and about me. I am also demanding that you immediately provide a retraction of your defamatory comments to those individuals to whom your defamatory falsehoods were sent. Be advised – I am prepared to take legal action, both criminal and civil, should you fail to heed this warning.
MICHAEL E. SCHOSTAK
Treasurer
Bloomfield Township, MI
Notice what is not in that letter: any mention of actual threats of violence. Schostak’s objection was to the content of the criticism itself—language he called “vile” and “hateful,” and allegations he called “defamatory.”
Aisen responded the way any American exercising his constitutional rights would: he forwarded Schostak’s threatening email to even more public officials, Jewish organizations, rabbis, and media personalities. He reiterated his detailed allegations against Schostak, challenged him to refute them, and pointed out the obvious abuse of office:
By copying the police chief and a sergeant of the Bloomfield township police department on his official Bloomfield Township board of trustees letterhead, there was an obvious implication that the department works for him personally as private henchmen. It’s an abuse of process and a violation of his oath of office… Michael Schostak is threatening me with arrest. Criticizing politicians in public discourse is a civil right, not a crime…
There were no threats—just strong criticism of a public official using the powers of his office to silence dissent.
What happened next is straight out of a Soviet playbook. In December 2023—three months after Aisen’s last email—Aisen was arrested in Massachusetts, extradited to Michigan, and locked up in Oakland County Jail.
Local news reported the arrest with headlines like “Massachusetts man arrested for allegedly harassing Bloomfield Township Treasurer,” falsely claiming an “onslaught of emails filled with threats and accusations.” They repeated Schostak’s patently false claims that Aisen had threatened his family – something he was never charged with.
Aisen has now been held in the Oakland County Jail pre-trial for over two and a half years. He lost his job, was evicted from his apartment, and lost every worldly possession he owned. New counsel (myself, working with the Jewish Community Advocacy Council and David Peters of the Pacific Justice Institute) only entered the case recently, yet the judge is pushing forward with trial anyway—scheduled to begin Monday—despite the defense not having adequate time to prepare.
The charges themselves are terrifying:
MCL 750.411s, Unlawful Posting of a Message. For this felony charge, you can be imprisoned for up to 2 years for posting a message online that “could cause” just two “unconsented contacts” with a “victim” that makes the “victim” feel “terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.” In other words, a public official simply claiming he felt “frightened” by criticism was enough to have a man arrested hundreds of miles away, extradited, and imprisoned indefinitely pretrial.
Marc Aisen’s case shows the horrifying breadth of this patently unconstitutional law. Under this law, a random X user in Oklahoma who tags Governor Gretchen Whitmer in a text that makes her feel frightened can be arrested at their home and dragged to Michigan to face felony charges. Think that can’t happen? That is exactly what happened to Marc Aisen for sending a critical email to a local city council member.
The second charge may be even more offensive to the constitution. MCL 752.796/752.797, Using a Computer to Commit a Crime. This law adds an additional 4-year felony enhancer. Here’s the kicker: it can be applied even if the defendant beats the underlying criminal charge. Meaning, even if the jury finds Marc Aisen not guilty of unlawfully posting a message, the jury can still convict him for “using a computer” even though he didn’t “commit a crime.” The judge can then sentence him to up to four years in prison. It sounds absurd. He can be sentenced to four years for using a computer – even without committing a crime. That is the actual law in Michigan.
Aside from the unconstitutional nature of the crimes, the process was used to punish Aisen. Even if Aisen ultimately beats the charges, he has already served a lengthy sentence.
Aisen’s public defenders, the prosecutors, and the judge all appear to have overlooked or ignored Michigan’s own 180-day rule on pretrial detention. The law was passed to prevent what happened to Marc Aisen. But a law meant to protect people from the system is meaningless because it requires the very same system to enforce it.
Immediately upon entering the case yesterday, we filed an emergency motion on his behalf demanding his immediate release and dismissal of charges with prejudice.
This case is so egregious that it is hard to believe it is actually happening in the United States of America and not the former Soviet Union. But it is. What I have set forth is just the tip of the iceberg of the constitutional violations in this case. The full story could fill a book, and one day it will.
This case is bigger than Marc Aisen. It is a warning to every American. Tyrannical governments always start with the vulnerable—those they think no one will defend. Vague statutes are being weaponized to criminalize political speech and criticism of public officials. If they can do this to a man who simply emailed a politician strong criticism from hundreds of miles away, they can do it to anyone.
The People of Michigan v. Marc Aisen should be required reading. If we don’t reform our broken justice system, this type of weaponisation will only escalate. I will continue to report on this case as it unfolds in the Oakland County Courthouse.
The post Soviet Style Trial in Michigan for Criticizing a Politician – A Horrifying True Story appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Judge Tony Graf on Friday rejected a request from Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin to ban cameras in the courtroom during the duration of the trial.
The judge also pushed Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing to July 6.
Judge Tony Graf assigned to Charlie Kirk Assassin Tyler Robinson case
Fox News reported:
Judge Tony Graf Jr. pushed accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing into July and rejected a bid to ban cameras from the courtroom, marking significant pretrial developments in the high-profile case.
Graf moved the preliminary hearing to July 6 through July 10, and denied Robinson’s motion to ban cameras and electronic media from the courtroom, allowing continued media coverage as the case moves forward.
The defense had argued that extensive pretrial publicity could prejudice jurors, citing survey data showing 99% of respondents in Utah County were aware of the case and 64% believed Robinson was guilty based on media coverage. However, the court found that argument insufficient to justify a categorical ban, noting that only about 25% of the public had watched live court proceedings, with most exposure coming from secondary commentary rather than raw courtroom footage.
Former assistant U.S. attorney and criminal defense attorney Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital he thinks these motions are part of the defense team’s long game, aimed at creating issues that could be raised during appeal.
Robinson fatally shot TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025 during an event at Utah Valley University.
Tyler Robinson allegedly used a Mauser 98 .30-06 rifle to kill Charlie Kirk.
Robinson was charged with:
– Count 1: Aggravated murder (capital offense)
– Count 2: Felony reckless discharge of a firearm causing bodily injury
– Count 3: Felony obstruction of justice for hiding the firearm
– Count 4: Felony obstruction of justice for discarding the clothing he wore during the shooting
– Count 5: Witness tampering for asking roommate to delete incriminating messages
– Count 6: Witness tampering for demanding trans roommate stay silent, and not speak to police
– Count 7: Commission of a violent offense in the presence of a child

Utah prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
Last month it was reported that newly-released search warrants revealed Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson’s damning handwritten note to his transgender lover, Lance Twiggs.
Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson and roommate Lance Twiggs
The newly-unsealed affidavit revealed that Tyler Robinson wrote a handwritten letter to his live-in lover Lance Twiggs, AKA, “Luna” in which he admits to a plot to kill Charlie Kirk.
“I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it,” Robinson wrote.
Investigators also recovered DNA, a palm print on the roof of the Losee Center building.
According to a new report, a bullet fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk’s body was identified as a .30 caliber that matched the rifle used by Tyler Robinson.
The post JUST IN: Judge in Charlie Kirk Murder Case Rules Cameras Will Be Allowed During Entire Duration of Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH RIGHT NOW!

The Most Exciting, Intense, High-Energy MAGA/America First Podcast in the USA!
2 Hours Daily, Monday-Friday, 6 to 8 PM Eastern, 3 to 5 PM Pacific
The post Watch Live: The WAR Zone Podcast With Wayne Allyn Root Presented by The Gateway Pundit-Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrat Gerrymandering Referendum appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Today on The Five, Greg Gutfeld took aim at leftists who have destroyed relationships with friends and even family members, over lies that they believe about Trump, such as the often repeated ‘Trump is Hitler’ lie.
This is something that Trump supporters understand all too well. If you interviewed ten Trump supporters, you would probably find that most of them have lost a family member or close friend due to Trump Derangement Syndrome. It’s a very common situation.
The worst part, as Gutfeld points out here, is that it’s all based on lies.
Transcript via Overton News:
Greg Gutfeld just delivered a savage 2-minute monologue exposing exactly why 60% of Democrats are ending relationships over politics.
He nailed the hypocrisy with one brutal question about dads and Trump:
“If your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?”
GUTFELD: “You know, the difference between Dems and Republicans come down to one thing.”
“They apply moral value to political preference, and that would make sense if your political party praised Hitler or protected murderers and sex fiends.”
“But the mistake is, it’s not the Republicans. But they have always compared Republicans to some kind of existential threat.”
“They’ve done it with climate change, they’ve done it with compassion, they do it with Trump.”
“That allows them to label them as amoral.”
“Republicans are not evil. We have a different path to the pursuit of happiness, and serenity…”
“I don’t care that you hate Trump. Why should you care that I like him? The answer would be because he’s evil.”
“He’s like a Nazi. Well, this is where the whole thing falls apart.”
“What does that mean to me if I’m your Republican friend who voted for Trump? That you would believe I would support a Nazi. We’ve been friends for years.”
“If you are my friend, you have to realize that’s illogical, because how were we friends for 10 or 20 years and now you find out I was a fascist?”
“How did that happen?”
“You knew I was a right winger in 80s, in the 90s and now all of the sudden you’re like, oh I can’t be seen with him.”
“So the key moment in the self-realization of a liberal should be, if your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe question whether your dad doesn’t love a Hitler figure?”
Watch the whole video below:

Greg Gutfeld just delivered a savage 2-minute monologue exposing exactly why 60% of Democrats are ending relationships over politics.
He nailed the hypocrisy with one brutal question about dads and Trump:
“If your dad loves Trump and you love your dad — shouldn’t you maybe… pic.twitter.com/ywAFNGuTof
— Overton (@overton_news) May 7, 2026

Many people on the left have taken an attitude of – You are either against Trump or against us.
It’s sad and it has ruined lots of relationships.
The post Greg Gutfeld Slams Leftists for Destroying Relationships With Others Over Lies They Believe About Trump (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Mollie Hemingway, political commentator and editor of The Federalist, recently appeared on the FOX Business Network and tore into former President Obama for his recent comments about Republicans.
Obama was just interviewed by Stephen Colbert and in the course of their talk, he criticized Republicans, claiming that they no longer believe in the rule of law.
Hemingway pointed out that Obama played a pivotal role in the Russia Collusion Hoax and found it sickening that he has the nerve to speak in this way.
Transcript via Real Clear Politics:
STUART VARNEY: Oh, my. What do you say to that? A bit rich, isn’t it?
MOLLIE HEMINGWAY: It’s almost reprehensible commentary from the man who led, who instigated the Russia collusion hoax, one of the most horrific things perpetrated on this country. He refused to accept his loss, so he orchestrated this entire effort to run a coup against the incoming president. It caused so much trouble, so many people were put in prison, and it was all based on something that he knew was a lie.
I’m glad that a wide variety of voices has condemned this lying from this former president. He did so much to destroy rule of law.
Holding people accountable for what they did to the country is not lawfare. It’s simply justice. People of all types need to speak out against what he did and how much he destroyed the FBI, the DOJ, our intelligence agencies, and our whole conception of accepting elections when you lose.
I know he’s sad that his party lost in 2016, but that’s no excuse for the real destruction he wrought on the country.
Here’s the video:

.@MZHemingway rips Obama after saying he wants a Republican party that respects the “rule of law.”
“It’s actually reprehensible commentary from the man who instigated the Russia collusion hoax, one of the most horrific things to ever be perpetrated on the country.”
“He refused… https://t.co/H5BjdCb1IU pic.twitter.com/zlBvAzvfPk
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) May 7, 2026

Obama has proven repeatedly that he is incapable of shame, so his comments should come as a surprise to no one.
He also seems to think that no one remembers anything about his presidency, like his use of the IRS to intimidate and harass Tea Party groups.
Tell us more about your reverence for the rule of law, Mr. President.
The post Mollie Hemingway RIPS Obama for Trash Talking GOP: ‘Reprehensible Commentary From the Man Who Instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Kamala Harris throws a fit over the Trump ballroom on “The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart.” Credit: The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart, YouTube screenshot.
Failed Democrat presidential candidate and former Vice President Kamala Harris is calling on her party to release their 2024 campaign autopsy report. The party received the report months ago but has refused to make the findings public.
Who wants to tell Kamala Harris that she probably should not be pushing for this?
The report is likely full of data about what an absolutely awful candidate she was and how the voting public couldn’t stand the sound of her voice and shuddered every time she was asked to answer a simple question.
NBC News reports:
Kamala Harris wants the DNC to release its autopsy report on the 2024 campaign
As former Vice President Kamala Harris considers another run for president, she is also signaling that she has no problem with a public airing of what went wrong last time — telling donors she believes the Democratic National Committee should release its buried autopsy of her failed 2024 campaign, according to a person who has heard the conversations.
While she indicated to donors that she had no issue with releasing it, Harris has not discussed the postmortem with DNC Chairman Ken Martin and did not know about his decision to keep it under wraps until it happened, this person said.
Like most prospective candidates, Harris is staying involved in political affairs. That includes touring the country, giving speeches to state parties, developing the framework for a policy platform and sounding out fellow Democrats about her next chapter.
What’s unique about Harris is that while she tries to orient toward the future, many in her party are actively fighting over whether to keep examining the flaws of her last campaign…
The subject of the autopsy’s release has grown into a flash point in the party, and it is dogging Martin, who had promised to conduct a comprehensive review of the defeat and share it with the public. Neither Martin nor the DNC responded to a request for comment.
Democrats are in a real bind here. The report is probably very damning to Harris, yet she could actually end up being their 2028 nominee. How can they release this without damaging her at the same time?
On an unrelated note, the report probably also contains data that is unflattering to the trans community, which is just another reason for the DNC to try to keep it all under wraps. They don’t want to insult their base.
The post BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR: Kamala Harris Wants Democrats to Release 2024 Campaign Autopsy Report appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump on Thursday evening drove through the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.
Last month, the president announced he is renovating the “filthy” Reflecting Pool and said it will be colored “American flag blue.”
“You’re going to end up with a beautiful, beautiful reflecting pool, the way it’s supposed to be,” Trump said to reporters last month. “Much better than it ever was, actually.”
Trump’s renovations cost an estimated $1.5 million compared to the $34 million Obama spent on the Reflecting Pool.
President Trump drove through the Reflecting Pool to see the progress and greet the team of contractors.
WATCH:

President @realDonaldTrump drives through the Reflecting Pool at the Lincoln Memorial to see the progress of the project and meet the hardworking team behind it pic.twitter.com/igN5rcJFNL
— Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) May 8, 2026

The President took questions from reporters amid news of an escalation in the Strait of Hormuz.
An ABC News reporter asked Trump why he’s focusing on renovating the Reflecting Pool while the US is at war with Iran.
“Why focus on these projects when gas prices are soaring?” the reporter asked Trump.
“You know why? Because I want to keep our country beautiful and safe! Beautiful also!” Trump said. “This was a disgusting place.”
Trump said they had to take 12 truckloads of garbage out of the water.
“Such a stupid question you ask,” Trump said. “This is one of the worst reporters; she’s with ABC fake news, and she’s a horror show!”
“She’s saying, why would you bother fixing this up? Why would I bother taking 11 or 12 truckloads of filth out of the water in front of the Lincoln Monument? That’s what made our country great. Beauty made our country!” Trump said.
“People made our country great. A question like that is a disgrace to our country,” Trump added.
WATCH:
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4ni4cs”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”);

Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v77d2me”,”div”:”rumble_v77d2me”});
The post Trump LIGHTS UP Reporter For Asking Why He Is Renovating Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Amid Conflict with Iran (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Will Roberts is the face of what happens when you remake medicine the MAGA way, not all the ways we’ve tried that haven’t worked.
Roberts, 15, first became the face of a rare and aggressive form of bone cancer. He then became the face of the right to try experimental treatments and of the kindness of strangers — including those who were strangers to him, but not to most of us.
Now, thanks to donors and Trump administration officials, the teen from Ralph, Alabama, is in Santa Monica, California, where an experimental treatment will hopefully make a difference in saving his life.
According to local outlet AL.com, Will was the first child of Jason and Brittney Roberts, who are both employed with the Alabama Bureau of Investigation. They had already lost their second child, Darby Kate, shortly after birth because of heart issues in 2013.
But the family’s “relationship with Christ grew,” Jason told AL.com, and Will and another sister, Charlie, began growing up.
Then, in 2025, things took a turn.
“It started out as knee pain,” Will Roberts told the outlet. “The pain would come and go, so I would chalk it up to growing pains.”
It wasn’t: It was osteosarcoma, a cancer of the bones. And while the prognosis was initially decent at a 70 percent survival rate, tests quickly moved that downward to 20 percent.
Even after chemotherapy and an operation to remove the middle part of his leg where the cancer was and reattach the remaining parts so that a prosthesis could be fitted, an aggressive tumor was found on his pelvis — and then began appearing throughout his body.
“It was like fighting a forest fire with a shovel,” said Jason.
Even after immunotherapy, a doctor told Will that no child he’d seen in his condition had lived, but that there was still hope.
Then, Will posted a plea on his mom’s Facebook page.
“I’ve been fighting osteosarcoma,” Will said in the April video. “It’s a very, very, very deadly and very hard-to-treat bone cancer.”
“My chemos are just not working, and I’ve been fighting it for a little bit now,” Will added. “I’ve tried basically everything there is and we’re getting toward the end of the road, and I need help.”
“Can y’all please just share this? Everything y’all can do to get this video to either President Donald Trump or [Health and Human Services Secretary] Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. That would help me just so much,” he said.

The video was first seen by an Alabama oil and real estate developer named Ric Myers, who forwarded it to the president.
According to the New York Post, the clip “then spread across the administration — from First Lady Melania Trump to Kennedy to Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”
“Oz put the family in touch with the Sarcoma Oncology Center in Santa Monica, which offers ‘innovative clinical trials and experimental treatments to offer hope for those facing hard-to-treat cancers.’”
Not only that, but a GoFundMe which aimed to raise $750,000 to offset the $500,000 treatment cost plus travel and other medical expenses already incurred has raised over $684,000.

“Man, y’all care so much for me to get this drug and I appreciate it so much,” Will said in a thank-you video on Facebook.
Thank you for being so brave, Will.
And thank this administration and those who stepped up for the right-to-try and for spurring on innovation. Considering what this would have looked like under Kamala Harris, one shudders to think where this would have ended.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post Melania, RFK, Dr. Oz, and MAGA Mobilize to Save Teen, 15, Fighting Bone Cancer and Facing Bill Family Could Never Pay appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

During an exclusive interview with The Western Journal this week, Dr. Monique Yohanan said Americans have a right to question the country’s vaccine schedule and must learn to advocate for themselves in medical settings.
Yohanan, who is director of the Center for Better Health at Independent Women, has an impeccable academic resume.
She received her medical degree from the Dartmouth/Brown Program and a Master of Public Health from Johns Hopkins. She did her residency in internal medicine at Harvard and a fellowship in geriatrics at Stanford.
In addition, Yohanan has held faculty appointments while maintaining active licensure and board certification in internal medicine.
Her CV, however, clashes with mainstream media narratives regarding vaccine skepticism. Those who pose questions about vaccinations are typically tagged as uneducated, misinformed, and are told to “trust the science.”
So why would someone with over 20 years of experience in clinical medicine, technology, and health policy speak out like this? Because she believes vaccination has become so politicized and deified that it’s harming patients.
“I feel like there’s a lot of dismissal of MAHA [Make America Healthy Again],” she said. “There’s a lot of dismissal of people who have questions about vaccines. There are people, historically, who framed the vaccine schedule as ‘You’re pro vaccine if you agree to every single vaccine, and that’s that.’ If you get all 27 shots and you shut your mouth and don’t say a word, then you’re a good person.’”
“And God forbid, you might say, ‘Well, I’m OK with my kid getting the shot for measles or for whooping cough, but do I really need the shot for hepatitis B?’”
Yohanan said that in California, “if you don’t get the shot for hepatitis B, your kid can’t go to public school.” And she’s correct. The state doesn’t even allow for religious or personal belief exemptions.
“That’s not a public health policy. To me, that is very coercive,” she added. “With COVID, what we had is so much, to me, of an overstatement of confidence that people started questioning everything, and so that’s where I come from, is that people are willing to have a more nuanced discussion.”
Yohanan also highlighted how California doctors are financially incentivized by Medicaid to get as many people vaccinated as possible.
“If your kid gets vaccinated against measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis tetanus, polio, all the rest, but doesn’t get the vaccination for hepatitis A, or doesn’t get the vaccination for hepatitis B, the doctor will get paid less,” she declared.
“I don’t think this is evil on the part of the doctors. This is not a big part of their funding, but it does factor into their quality scores.”
She then said she believes this year’s flu shot is ineffective, adding, “it just doesn’t work.”
It especially troubles her that pharmacies continually offer flu shots to customers and patients who’ve already said no.
Her thoughts on vaccines stemmed from an op-ed she wrote for Townhall late last month titled, “Questioning Vaccines Isn’t Fringe — Even Among Harris Voters.”
In it, Yohanan cited a Politico poll revealing that “vaccine skepticism among Americans is widespread,” with 36 percent of Harris voters agreeing “that the facts on vaccines are still up for debate.”
“That’s not a fringe element. That’s a constituency,” her article read. “It isn’t ignorance that needs correction. It’s a signal that deserves to be understood.”
Yohanan told The Western Journal that President Donald Trump did the right thing rolling out Operation Warp Speed during the pandemic, but cautioned that it was a “different virus” back then. She also touched upon the threat of myocarditis, a potentially fatal inflammation of the heart, that’s been seen in mRNA vaccine recipients.
“I think the evidence is real for harm, especially in young men, the evidence for myocarditis,” she stated. “I think there are people who have underplayed that signal and they’ve had an institutional pressure to stick with this.”
As for COVID booster shots, Yohanan said people shouldn’t be getting jabbed over and over again, unless there are special circumstances.
“I truly don’t understand this, other than it’s almost like a religion for some people,” she added.
When asked if her Christian faith plays a role in her work, she cited her Catholic upbringing, before saying, “I don’t see how you can just be a scientist. I’m trained as a scientist, and I care very much … I was a hospice doctor. I think about the amount of time that I spent in rooms, having been there during the anointing of the sick, feeling somebody’s spirit leave the room, and knowing what that means to people and [I know] that kind of intercession is important.”
She said she sees medicine through a lens of “faith” and “church,” adding that it has served as a “guidepost” for her throughout her career.
“I do take that very seriously,” the Ivy Leaguer continued. “It’s something that culturally, I feel, we’ve lost in some ways, which is a shame.”
She also thinks the medical industry should apologize to the doctors it “tried to silence” who had questions during the pandemic, if they ever hope to win back public trust.
“I feel like public health leadership earned the distrust of a lot of people,” she explained. “A lot of the kids who are now sick are kids who, during the Biden administration, didn’t get vaccinated because they didn’t trust the system during COVID. They didn’t trust the shutdowns. They lost a trust in public health.
“I’m not saying people weren’t trying their best,” she concluded. “But they made mistakes.”
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post EXCLUSIVE: Harvard-Trained MD Says ‘Coercive’ Vaccine Push Shattered Trust and Has Harris Voters Questioning the Experts appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.