Author: adler

Police on Friday released bodycam footage of Justin Timberlake’s 2024 DUI arrest in the Hamptons.
In June 2024, singer and songwriter Justin Timberlake was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in the Hamptons in New York.
Timberlake was partying at The American Hotel bar in Sag Harbor in the Hamptons before he hopped in the driver seat of his BMW and blew through a stop sign.
Police began tailing Timberlake and noticed he was swerving.
Timberlake refused the breathalyzer after failing the field sobriety tests.
According to reports, Timberlake was arraigned on one count of DUI and running a stop sign. He was released from custody without bail.
Justin Timberlake mugshot
TMZ reported that Timberlake told cops he had “one martini” and followed his friends home. However, according to a witness, Justin Timberlake was “wasted” and drinking other people’s drinks before he was arrested for driving under the influence.
TMZ obtained surveillance video of Timberlake driving his BMW X7 right before he was pulled over.
Timberlake appeared to be swerving.
WATCH:

Check out the surveillance footage #TMZ has obtained of #JustinTimberlake cruising down the street just moments before he was arrested for DWI. pic.twitter.com/nqtUXFGGTM
— TMZ (@TMZ) June 18, 2024

On Friday, Sag Harbor Village Police Department released the bodycam footage from Justin Timberlake’s DUI arrest.
Timberlake recently sued for an injunction blocking the release of the bodycam video.
Police released a redacted version of the arrest video – and it shows a very drunk Timberlake struggling through the field sobriety test.
At one point Justin Timberlake tried to get out of doing a field sobriety test but the officer told him he wasn’t free to leave.
WATCH:
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4ni4cs”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”);

Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v757wha”,”div”:”rumble_v757wha”});
The post Police Release Bodycam Footage of Justin Timberlake’s DUI Arrest – Very Drunk Pop Star Struggles Through Field Sobriety Test (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A Mississippi street preacher who sued a community over a law that banned him from preaching near an amphitheater has won his battle to challenge the law.
Gabriel Olivier claimed his arrest under a law passed by Brandon, Mississippi, violated his First Amendment rights, according to the Associated Press.
The city said he had shouted insults, and invoked the law to fine Olivier and slap him with a year of probation. Olivier paid the fine and completed his probation.
The decision allowed Olivier to move forward but does not ensure he will win the suit.
“This is not only a win for the right to share your faith in public, but also a win for every American’s right to have their day in court when their First Amendment rights are violated,” Kelly Shackelford, president, CEO, and chief counsel for First Liberty Institute, said in a news release on First Liberty’s website.
“We’re delighted that the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed Gabe’s right to his day in court. It’s just common sense that a citizen who is arrested under an unconstitutional law should be able to challenge that law. As people of faith, we look to the judiciary to protect our constitutional right to spread the gospel,” Allyson Ho, co-chair of First Liberty’s nationwide Appellate and Constitutional Law Practice Group, added.
“No American should be criminally charged for sharing their faith in public,” Nate Kellum, senior counsel at First Liberty, remarked. “This is a wonderful day for Gabe and for the First Amendment.”
Olivier himself said that “my goal from the beginning was to be granted my rights as an American citizen under our great Constitution.”
“Now all people with deeply held Christian religious beliefs who are called to share the good news can do so in the public arena.”
As noted by SCOTUSBlog, Olivier was battling an argument from the city that a 1994 ruling, Heck v. Humphrey, should be used to block his lawsuit. The ruling limits challenges convicted criminals can bring against a law under which they were convicted.
But the court ruled that Olivier was not appealing his conviction, which would have been within the purview of Heck v. Humphrey. He was challenging the law so that no one else would be convicted.
“Petitioner Gabriel Olivier is a street preacher in Mississippi who believes that sharing his religious views with fellow citizens is an important part of exercising his faith. His vocation sometimes took him to the sidewalks near an amphitheater in the City of Brandon, where he could find sizable audiences attending events,” the court wrote in its ruling. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion for the unanimous court.
“In 2019, the City adopted an ordinance requiring all individuals or groups engaging in ‘protests’ or ‘demonstrations,’ at around the time events were scheduled, to stay within a ‘designated protest area.’ In 2021, Olivier was arrested for violating that ordinance. He pleaded no contest in municipal court. The court imposed a $304 fine, one year of probation, and 10 days of imprisonment to be served only if he violated the ordinance during his probation. Olivier did not appeal, paid the fine, and served no prison time,” the ruling said.
“Because he still wanted to preach near the amphitheater, Olivier filed suit against the City in federal court under 42 U. S. C. §1983, alleging that the city ordinance violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment by consigning him and other speakers to the amphitheater’s protest area. The complaint seeks, as a remedy, a declaration that the ordinance infringes the First Amendment and an injunction preventing city officials from enforcing the ordinance in the future,” the ruling added.
“Olivier seeks neither the reversal of, nor compensation for his prior conviction,” the ruling said.
“Olivier’s suit seeking purely prospective relief — an injunction stopping officials from enforcing an ordinance in the future — can proceed, notwithstanding Olivier’s prior conviction for violating that ordinance; Heck does not hold otherwise.”
The ruling continued that “there is no looking back in Olivier’s suit; both in the allegations made, and in the relief sought, the suit is entirely future oriented — even if success in it shows that something past should not have occurred.”
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Arrested Christian Street Preacher appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a 15-minute phone call with MS NOW Stephanie Ruhle, President Donald J. Trump laid bare the chilling reality behind America’s decisive military actions against the Iranian regime.
According to Ruhle’s own recap on air, Trump revealed that Iran was mere “two weeks” away from having a nuclear bomb – and they fully intended to use it against America and our allies.
“He said that Iran was two weeks away from having a nuclear bomb—and that they would use it,” Ruhle reported.
This directly contradicts claims from so-called “experts” frequently cited by legacy media outlets, who have insisted Iran was at least a year away from such capability and poses no imminent threat.
The President also doubled down on his assessment of recent U.S. military operations, telling Ruhle that Iran’s infrastructure and capabilities have been “decimated.”
This aligns with previous statements from Trump following U.S. strikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities, where he declared the sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.”
And now, Trump is making it clear: the damage is so extensive that Iran would need up to a decade to rebuild.
According to Ruhle’s account, Trump explained that while America has already crippled Iran’s capabilities, the regime would eventually rebuild, and that outcome is “not acceptable.”
That’s why, in Trump’s view, the mission must continue.
“He said that we could leave the war right now—we could walk away tomorrow—because we have just decimated most of the country and their power. But he said the regime would rebuild; it would take them about 10 years. That’s not an acceptable situation, which is why he thinks we should stay.
“He said the major thing is they cannot have a nuclear weapon. “We obliterated it. We totally obliterated it.” So, that’s very good that we’re there.”
In another blow to globalist alliances, Trump reportedly slammed NATO allies during the call, accusing them of failing to contribute meaningfully to the conflict.
WATCH:

MSNBC reports “BREAKING NEWS” after one of their anchors had a 15-minute phone call with President Trump.
Here’s what he revealed to Stephanie Ruhle:
• “He said that Iran was two weeks away from having a nuclear bomb and they would use it.”
• “He said that we could leave the… pic.twitter.com/t1XpkEfX8m
— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) March 20, 2026

More from MS NOW:
Trump said the U.S. “totally obliterated” Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon with Operation Midnight Hammer in June, but there was still what he called “nuclear dust,” the enriched uranium that nuclear experts believe is mostly stockpiled under a mountain in Isfahan.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Iran is no longer capable of enriching uranium or producing ballistic missiles. If Netanyahu’s statement is correct, Iran apparently no longer has the centrifuges to create a nuclear weapon from the “nuclear dust” Trump described, and Israel and the U.S. would have achieved one of their primary objectives.
Experts and administration officials have said that retrieving that uranium would entail a lengthy and dangerous operation that could even require ground troops.
Trump also repeated his assertion that Iran was “two weeks” away from having nuclear weapons after the June attack by U.S. bombers on three nuclear sites in Iran. Trump said that material would have been used “within a day or two or a week,” a claim that members of his administration appear to have disputed. Experts say that while Iran could have enriched the uranium to bomb-grade status quickly, it would have taken longer to make any kind of weapon.
When asked if the U.S. has the same goals as Israel, who helped the U.S. wage its war with Iran, Trump said the goals are “largely similar,” but the difference with Israel is that they “live right next door” to Iran and “we don’t.” Israel and Iran do not share a border.
Despite the massive targeting of military targets by the U.S. and selective targeting of political ones by Israel — resulting in the killing of Iran’s supreme leader and the installation of his son — the war has unleashed chaos in the Middle East, killed thousands of people, including U.S. troops, and destabilized global oil markets as Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz and targeted oil facilities in the Persian Gulf.
The post President Trump Reveals Iran Was “Two Weeks” from Nuclear Bomb, Says U.S. Has “Decimated” Regime but Must Stay to Stop Rebuild appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Why are we basically the only ones dumb enough to not require voter ID?
Full country breakdown @gatewaypundit pic.twitter.com/3rxcc5jj2z
— Victor Nieves (@ItsVictorNieves) March 20, 2026

Why are we basically the only ones dumb enough to not require voter ID?
Around the world we are the exception, not the rule.
The Gateway Pundit broke down the statistics:
The Democrats oppose voter ID laws and are in favor of mail-in voting, while calling Republicans fascists for not agreeing with them.
However, a review of voting laws around the world shows that the overwhelming majority of countries, at least 176 nations and jurisdictions, require voter ID.
Many have no mail-in voting at all, while others allow only very limited domestic mail-in voting restricted to those who are hospitalized, and no country allows illegal aliens to vote.
While a small number of countries permit long-term legal residents to vote in local elections under strict residency conditions, even fewer allow non-citizen residents to vote in national elections.
No countries besides the United States allow jurisdictions, states, provinces, or cities to prohibit poll workers from asking voters for ID.
Most other democracies use automatic civil registration through national ID systems, making same-day walk-in voter registration an unknown concept abroad.
The elephant in the room here is pretty obvious.
Why do you think the Democrats have made this their hill to die on? Why will they do everything in their power to oppose legislation that is supported by the vast majority of Americans?
Reasonable Americans should keep this in mind as they head to the polls this midterm election.
The post Victor Reacts: Why Are We the Ones Without Voter ID? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

James O’Keefe, members of the O’Keefe Media Group and other journalists were violently attacked on Skid Row on Friday.
O’Keefe and other journalists confronted petitioners who were engaging in a cash for ballots scheme when all hell broke loose.
A cameraman was punched in the face and others were pepper-sprayed.
“My team, myself & @camhigby were just violently assaulted on Skid Row, my camera crew were punched in the neck and face, we were pepper sprayed, but thankfully just escaped. Some members of our team had to run 10 blocks to get out,” James O’Keefe said.
“We were in the heart of Skid Row confronting the petitioners who @Savsays and my team caught on tape illegally offering drugs for ballot signatures,” O’Keefe said.
WATCH:

My team, myself & @camhigby were just violently assaulted on Skid Row, my camera crew were punched in the neck and face, we were pepper sprayed, but thankfully just escaped. Some members of our team had to run 10 blocks to get out.
We were in the heart of Skid Row confronting… https://t.co/lCmAAPl1op pic.twitter.com/MAOu1oic2L
— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 20, 2026

The O’Keefe Media Group on Tuesday released part one of its investigation into a California elections fraud cash for ballots scheme.
James O’Keefe and his team of journalists went undercover on Skid Row in Los Angeles posing as homeless people.
‘Petitioners’ told the undercover journalists that they are paid between $7-$10 per signature. Some of them earn up to $1,000 per day.
“California NGOs Encourage Fake Addresses To Homeless People To Sign Petitions & Register Voters, A State & Federal Felony. Footage Shows 28 Instances Of Cash Changing Hands For Ballot Signatures & Voter Registration Forms,” they said.

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS FRAUD CASH FOR BALLOTS PART I: Homeless Bribed with Cash & Drugs In Exchange For Registering To Vote & Signing Election Petitions Caught On Tape Undercover On Skid Row In California.
“You can just put Pinocchio Lane.”
California NGOs Encourage Fake… pic.twitter.com/2pkylhgPY9
— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 17, 2026

US Attorney Bill Essayli responded to the O’Keefe Media Group’s latest undercover sting exposing a cash for ballots scheme in California.
“Under 52 U.S.C. § 10307(c), it is a federal crime to provide false information on a voter registration form or to offer payment to complete a voter registration form,” Bill Essayli said.
“While longstanding DOJ policy prevents me from discussing specific investigations, I want to assure the public that this DOJ, under the leadership of @AGPamBondi, will aggressively pursue anyone and everyone involved in violating federal election laws,” Essayli said.
The post James O’Keefe and OMG Team Violently Assaulted on Skid Row After Catching Petitioners in a Cash For Ballots Scheme (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Screenshot
RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) is now attempting to gut key provisions of the SAVE America Act, filing an amendment that would allow individuals born before 1961 to bypass proof-of-citizenship requirements when registering to vote.
The Gateway Pundit has repeatedly exposed RINO betrayals and efforts to undermine election integrity, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s (R-AK) history of siding with Democrats on key issues that weaken conservative priorities.
Just weeks ago, we reported how this Alaska senator flat-out refused to support the SAVE America Act, parroting leftist talking points about “disenfranchising” voters while ignoring the real threat of non-citizen voting that threatens our republic.
Now, Murkowski is doubling down on her sabotage. The RINO senator has filed an amendment to the SAVE America Act that would weaken the bill’s core citizenship proof requirements, specifically allowing individuals born before 1961 to bypass providing documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.
This carve-out would create a massive loophole in the legislation, which is designed to ensure only American citizens vote in federal elections by requiring in-person proof like a certified birth certificate, passport, or REAL ID indicating citizenship.
Murkowski’s floor speech defending her opposition to the SAVE Act (focused on the substitute amendment to Senate Bill 1383) was a masterclass in excuses. She claimed the bill’s immediate implementation would create “logistical challenges” in her massive, remote state of Alaska, one-fifth the size of the continental U.S. with a tiny population of just over 700,000.
She whined about dog sled races covering 1,000 miles through roadless areas, the burdens on elderly Alaska Natives born in remote villages without easy access to birth certificates, and the lack of federal funding for states to comply.
The SAVE America Act is a straightforward, common-sense measure to protect elections from fraud—building on what most states already require for voter ID while closing the loophole on non-citizen registration.
Yet Murkowski, the sole Republican who voted against even opening debate on the bill (joining every Democrat in a 51-48 procedural vote), is now pushing this pre-1961 exemption amendment to let older voters skip the citizenship proof step.
According to the Congressional Record:

SA 4661. Ms. MURKOWSKI submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 4420 proposed by Mr. THUNE (for Mr. SCHMITT) to the bill S. 1383, to establish the Veterans Advisory Committee on Equal Access, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 6, line 13, insert ‘‘This subsection and any other provision of this Act relating to the requirement to provide documentary proof of United States citizenship shall not apply with respect to an individual born before December 31, 1960.’’ after ‘‘application.’’.

Here’s a video of Murkowski speaking out against the SAVE America Act:

JUST IN: Lisa Murkowski has just submitted an AMENDMENT to the SAVE America Act, EXEMPTING people born before 1961 from having to prove their citizenship
If you can’t be bothered to prove you’re a citizen, you have no business voting to begin with.
Stop nitpicking and pass… pic.twitter.com/9sao9egzA6
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 20, 2026

The post RINO Lisa Murkowski Moves to WEAKEN SAVE America Act — Files Amendment Letting Pre-1961 Births BYPASS Citizenship Proof Requirements appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The late Val Kilmer – Photo by Georges Biard/Wiki Commons
A new means of expression, or a shameful exploitation?
A year ago, in April 2025, Hollywood star Val Kilmer passed away, putting an end to a storied career – or so we thought.
The news arose yesterday that Kilmer – or at least an AI replica of him – is to appear in a new movie, As Deep as the Grave, by brothers Coerte and John Voorhees.
The pair had originally written one of the roles in the film for Val Kilmer.

The late Val Kilmer will appear in AI form in the upcoming indie movie As Deep as the Grave, which has the support of Kilmer’s estate (which was compensated) and his daughter Mercedes. https://t.co/gI88dHd8Bu pic.twitter.com/4aw9yrr1R3
— IGN (@IGN) March 18, 2026

The Telegraph reported:
“Mr. Kilmer’s cancer diagnosis forced him to abandon the project, and he died soon after in April 2025.
But now, using generative AI tools, a digital replica of Mr. Kilmer has been added into the movie. The AI-generated likeness was created from a trove of videos, images and audio recorded before Mr. Kilmer’s death.”

AI revives Val Kilmer for new film
Posthumous AI role for Val Kilmer
Kilmer’s AI role: ‘As deep as the role’@BislaDiksha gets you more pic.twitter.com/5SqlX3hIFj
— WION (@WIONews) March 19, 2026

“Mr. Kilmer’s daughter Mercedes told The New York Times that her father ‘always looked at emerging technologies with optimism as a tool to expand the possibilities of storytelling… This spirit is something that we are all honoring within this specific film, of which he was an integral part’.”

VAL KILMER RESURRECTED BY AI – DEAD STAR BACK ON SCREEN!
Actor Val Kilmer passed last year.
Hollywood used AI to shove him into a new movie anyway.
Family said yes. Internet split.
Death is no longer a valid excuse to get out of your contract.
Hollywood wins again.
Source:… https://t.co/wi83JB5ABf pic.twitter.com/DSUkfD4xHz
— NewsForce (@Newsforce) March 19, 2026

Some Fans are reacting poorly to the news.
Fox News reported:
“’I do not care how much permission they had to do this, no one should be allowed to do this’, a [social media commenter] said. ‘It should be illegal to resurrect the visage of dead people with genAI imo’.
Someone else wrote, ‘No amount of moral dressing is going to change how sick and greedy this is. The family should be ashamed tbh.’
‘This is difficult, another person posted. ‘If Val wanted this, and desired to go with ‘one final hurray’, maybe it is acceptable. (When Oliver Reed died during Gladiator, they used a body double + light CGI to finish his scenes) But, when this becomes the norm…’”
Read more:
Hollywood Legend Val Kilmer Dead at 65
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i

The Democrats have repeatedly voted to block funding for the Department of Homeland Security.
On Friday, Democrats once again blocked funding for the DHS and TSA.
Hundreds of TSA agents have quit their jobs after missing a paycheck.
10% of TSA workers have called in sick after missing a paycheck.
American travelers are spending hours in security check lines and missing flights because the Democrats are refusing to fund the DHS.
And now the Democrats are admitting their refusal to fund the Department of Homeland Security is “making people hurt.”
Axios reported:
House Democrats are launching a Hail Mary push to effectively end the Department of Homeland Security’s now month-long shutdown by funding all of its sub-agencies except ICE and Customs and Border Protection.
Why it matters: Democrats are feeling the heat as federal workers miss paychecks and DHS warns of airport closures. They hope their planned discharge petition will, at the very least, deflect blame onto Republicans.

Many lawmakers also question whether keeping the agency shut down is meaningfully incentivizing the White House to negotiate in good faith on immigration enforcement reforms.
“It’s not forcing any change,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.). “In the meantime, we’re making people hurt. The long lines, that can’t make us more popular.”
“We’re on the right side on ICE, but not on the rest.”

The Department of Homeland Security responded.
“Democrats have ADMITTED that their DHS shutdown is hurting the American people as security lines keep growing, hundreds of travelers miss their flights, and TSA officers and other DHS employees are forced to turn to food banks because they have not been paid,” DHS said.
“Enough is enough.”

“We’re making people hurt.”
Democrats have ADMITTED that their DHS shutdown is hurting the American people as security lines keep growing, hundreds of travelers miss their flights, and @TSA officers and other DHS employees are forced to turn to food banks because they have not… pic.twitter.com/3fNUyGubEQ
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) March 20, 2026

The post “We’re Making People Hurt” – Democrats ADMIT Their DHS Shutdown is Hurting American People as Travelers Miss Flights appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump weighs in on Chuck Norris’s death during a question-and-answer session outside the White House. Credit: Fox News screenshot
President Trump has weighed in on the death of one of America’s most legendary action stars and martial arts experts.
As The Gateway Pundit reported on Friday, Chuck Norris died at the age of 86.
This occurred one day after he suffered an unspecified medical emergency. The incident reportedly occurred within the last 24 hours.
Norris enjoyed a long acting career, including the hit show “Walker, Texas Ranger,” and movies like “Delta Force” and “Missing in Action.”
He also starred with Bruce Lee in the epic 1972 martial arts film “The Way of the Dragon”.
In addition, Norris was a longtime conservative activist and supporter of GOP politicians, as well as a contributor to conservative publications, including The Gateway Pundit.
Here is a piece he contributed to TGP on Trump’s re-election.
Chuck Norris: Two Presidents Who Were NOT Supposed to Win (and When I Met Each of Them)
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i

Screenshot
President Donald Trump has put an end to swirling rumors that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is on her way out.
Speaking directly to reporters, Trump firmly defended his DNI pick, declaring she “did a good job yesterday” during her high-stakes congressional testimony regarding the Iran conflict.
WATCH:

Reporter: Is Tulsi Gabbard still safe as DNI?
Trump: I think she did a good job yesterday pic.twitter.com/UN84Sjiliu
— Officer Lew (@officer_Lew) March 20, 2026

The latest wave of speculation began after Gabbard’s recent appearances before congressional committees, where she faced intense questioning from lawmakers.
That’s when Laura Loomer claimed Gabbard’s resignation was imminent.
According to Loomer, Gabbard’s own political staff allegedly expected her to step down, citing dissatisfaction with her congressional testimony.
Loomer wrote that Gabbard instead emphasized the president’s constitutional authority, which she tried to spin as a lack of support.

 “@TulsiGabbard’s political staff expect that she is about to RESIGN, following the resignation of her colleague @joekent16jan19. This comes after two days of her testimony in front of Congress this week where she never once expressed support for President Trump or his decisions.
Instead, she used her time during the hearings to affirm President Trump’s right to make decisions as President of the United States, making it clear she doesn’t support those decisions. Despite what she is telling the White House, one of her closest advisors anticipates her resignation is coming soon. President Trump should not allow Gabbard the dignity of a resignation, followed by her immediately trashing him on MSDNC, CNN, the View, and Tucker Carlson’s podcast.”

But on Friday, President Trump put an end to the rumor that DNI Tulsi Gabbard is on her way out.
It can be recalled that a furious President Trump fired DHS Secretary Kristi Noem following her testimony before the Senate and House Judiciary panels.
Punchbowl News reported that President Trump was so angry with Noem’s performance, particularly before the Senate, that he is contacting congressional Republicans to see whether he should send her packing.
One particular exchange that ticked Trump off was one Noem had with Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) about a DHS campaign funded by American taxpayers.
A report from Fox News correspondent Jacqui Heinrich suggests that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Senate testimony earlier this week defending a massive $200 million immigration ad campaign may have been the final straw that pushed President Donald Trump to remove her from the post.
According to Heinrich, Trump was reportedly furious after learning that Noem told lawmakers on Capitol Hill that the president had approved the costly advertising effort, an assertion the White House now says is not true.
Read more: 
REPORT: Kristi Noem’s Senate Testimony Defending $200M Immigration Ad Campaign Pushes Trump to Remove Her
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i