Author: adler

  • **UPDATED** WATCH LIVE: President Trump and First Lady Melania Make Grand Entrance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner

    **UPDATED** WATCH LIVE: President Trump and First Lady Melania Make Grand Entrance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner

    Update: The WHCD has ended due to a shooting incident.
    There are reports that President Trump may return to the stage after a shooting incident at the Washington Hilton.
    President Trump on Saturday night is headlining the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
    Trump is attending the WHCA Dinner for the first time as President.
    “For more than 100 years, the journalists of the White House Correspondents’ Association have enjoyed an evening with the president, a dinner that celebrates the First Amendment while supporting the work we do including awards honoring excellent journalism and scholarships to help the next generation of reporters who someday will be the ones asking the questions at the White House,” said Weijia Jiang, President, WHCA.
    “We’re happy the president has accepted our invitation and look forward to hosting him,” he said.
    President Trump and First Lady Melania traveled to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner together.
    The First Lady and President Trump made a grand entrance at the WHCD.
    WATCH:
    !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4ni4cs”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”);

    Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v76tk52″,”div”:”rumble_v76tk52″});
    WATCH LIVE HERE:

    The post **UPDATED** WATCH LIVE: President Trump and First Lady Melania Make Grand Entrance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Georgia Wildfires Burn Over 40,000 Acres, Destroy 120 Homes (VIDEO)

    Georgia Wildfires Burn Over 40,000 Acres, Destroy 120 Homes (VIDEO)

    Two massive Georgia wildfires have burned over 40,000 acres and destroyed 120 homes.
    Authorities do not believe the fires are the work of arsonists.
    Georgia Governor Brian Kemp said one of the fires was sparked by a wayward Mylar balloon that struck an electrical line.
    Firefighters are also battling wildfires in northern Florida.
    CBS News reported:
    Two massive wildfires in south Georgia have scorched more than 40,000 acres and destroyed over 120 homes.
    Extreme drought has turned the region into a tinderbox and allowed flames to spread. Overnight, new fires sparked in rural south Georgia. High winds have made efforts to contain the fires difficult, officials said in a news conference Saturday afternoon.
    Brantley County Manager Joey Cason called the wildfires a “dynamic situation” in a Saturday morning video posted to social media and begged residents to “please evacuate” if they are ordered to do so. New evacuation orders were issued as the fire spread.
    “Leave the scene. This fire is moving at a fast pace and we do not have much control over where it’s currently moving. Please leave,” Cason said Saturday afternoon at a news conference, addressing Georgia residents facing evacuation orders.
    Firefighters battled the blaze in southern Georgia.
    WATCH:

    NEW VIDEO: Wildfires tear through southern Georgia, wiping out more than 35,000 acres and destroying nearly 90 homes as residents witness the effects of historic drought conditions.
    Smoke from fires in southeast Georgia have also caused Air Quality Alerts as dry winds continue… pic.twitter.com/ywq1DG5xye
    — Fox News (@FoxNews) April 24, 2026

    Georgia Governor Brian Kemp delivered remarks on the state’s efforts to put out the wildfires.
    Governor Kemp said the two fires are the most destructive in Georgia’s history.
    Kemp said one of the fires is 15% contained.
    WATCH:

    Brian Kemp: The Pineland Fire and Highway 82 fire rank number one and two in the country. So we got the two most dangerous, biggest problematic fires anywhere in the United States. We believe that these two fires have created the most lost homes ever in the history of our state. pic.twitter.com/RK6kPttT8Z
    — Blue Georgia (@BlueGeorgia) April 25, 2026

    The post Georgia Wildfires Burn Over 40,000 Acres, Destroy 120 Homes (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Trans Substitute Teacher Arrested for Allegedly Planning ‘Murder Spree’ at High School

    Trans Substitute Teacher Arrested for Allegedly Planning ‘Murder Spree’ at High School

    A transgender substitute teacher at a Virginia school has been arrested after he allegedly threatened to go on a “murder spree” at a local high school.
    The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office said it arrested Hadyn Dollery, 19, of South Riding, on charges of making threats of bodily injury,
    “LCSO received information through the Safe2Talk app indicating that Dollery made statements threatening violence at John Champe High School on an online platform,” the sheriff’s office said.
    Dollery was arrested on school grounds, according to the Loudoun Times-Mirror.
    Dollery is locked up at the Loudoun County Adult Detention Center and has a court date of May 26 on the charges.
    Dollery self-identifies as a woman but was locked up as a man, according to the New York Post.

    NEW: The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office arrested a Loudoun County Public Schools substitute teacher.
    The Sheriff’s office says: Hadyn Dollery, 19, of Chantilly, was arrested and charged with Threats of Bodily Injury after LCSO received information through the Safe2Talk app… pic.twitter.com/2O0B2jkWm2
    — Nick Minock (@NickMinock) April 23, 2026

    Deputy Chris Freck wrote in a criminal complaint that on April 16, the sheriff’s office received an allegation that Dollery made online threats against family and friends, according to the Loudoun Times-Mirror.
    Freck said the threats included going on a “murder spree” at a school.
    Dollery’s message allegedly included a “kill list,” Freck said.
    School representative Dan Adams said Dollery was a “non-licensed” substitute but has since been taken off the list.
    To be a non-licensed substitute in Virginia, an individual need only be 18 and have graduated from high school.
    Adams did not say which schools used Dollery as a substitute.
    “LCPS takes all threats seriously as safety of students, staff and visitors is our highest priority,” Adams said.

    The nation has been rocked by prominent transgender-identifying school shooters in recent years.

    Audrey Hale, a female who identified as a male, killed six in March 2023 at the Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, before killing herself.
    In August 2025, two children were killed during a mass shooting at the Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis as students of the Annunciation Catholic School were attending a school-wide Mass to mark the opening of the academic year. Robert Westman, a male who had his name legally changed to Robin, was responsible for that shooting.
    In February, self-described transgender student Jesse Strang shot nine people to death in British Columbia, Canada.

    A 2025 analysis of planned or successfully executed mass school shootings by The Western Journal in the aftermath of the Minneapolis incident found that roughly 40 percent of them since 2020 have involved transgender-identifying suspects.

    This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
    The post Trans Substitute Teacher Arrested for Allegedly Planning ‘Murder Spree’ at High School appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Illegal Aliens Can Never Get Citizenship, Says UK Spokesman on Immigration and National Security

    Illegal Aliens Can Never Get Citizenship, Says UK Spokesman on Immigration and National Security

    Since 2022, an average of about 37,000 migrants have arrived in the UK by small boat each year, based on UK Home Office data analyzed by the Migration Observatory. The top nationalities include Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, Albania, Syria, and Eritrea. Photo courtesy of the UK government.
     
    At a press conference in Dover, Zia Yusuf, Reform UK’s spokesperson on immigration, policing, and national security, launched the party’s mass deportation proposal. He described the UK as “invaded” by migrants and said the plan would be the largest deportation programme in British history. Reform has stated it would deport more than 600,000 people in its first term, using a dedicated unit to track down, detain, and remove those in the country illegally, at a rate of up to 288,000 per year.
    Yusuf was born in October 1986 in Bellshill, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, the son of Sri Lankan Muslim immigrants who came to the UK in the early 1980s. His father is a doctor and his mother a nurse, both working for the National Health Service (NHS). A Muslim son of immigrants leading a party strongly associated with anti-immigration politics, Yusuf nonetheless shares many concerns familiar to American conservatives.
    Reform UK’s platform addresses illegal immigration, welfare dependency among foreign nationals, and terminating a permanent residency system that gives non-citizens lifetime access to benefits and the right to bring unlimited family members into the country. The party also demands that legal migrants be net contributors to the economy and speak English.
    On security, Yusuf argues that Islamist extremism, the dominant share of MI5’s caseload, has gone unaddressed by a government that has preferred to promote right-wing extremism as the primary threat. He links that same culture of avoidance to the grooming gang scandal, in which organized child sexual exploitation by men of Pakistani heritage was covered up for decades by authorities unwilling to confront it. When warnings were ignored and attacks occurred, no one in government was fired and no one was held accountable.
    His Reform Party also wants to leave the European Convention on Human Rights, which has been used to block deportations of foreign nationals, including convicted criminals, and which British voters have no power to override.
    On legal migrants, Yusuf drew a clear line between tolerance and subsidy. Those in the country on a legal visa, he said, are expected “to pay your way, i.e. be a net contributor to the economy and not be a burden on the taxpayer, to speak English and to not commit crime.” Reform also plans to abolish permanent residency, replacing it with a system requiring visa renewal every five years or a defined path to citizenship.
    “This country can ill afford to continue to be a food bank for the world,” he said, pointing to the £9 billion ($12 billion) spent on universal credit (the UK’s main welfare program) for foreign nationals in the previous year alone. He warned that figure would grow as the 3.8 million people who entered under Boris Johnson become eligible for permanent residency (indefinite leave to remain), at which point they gain lifetime access to the welfare system and the right to bring unlimited dependents into the country.
    “It’s totally unfair to expect them to foot that bill,” he said of British taxpayers, “and even worse to brand them racist.” Just like in the US, anyone who speaks out against open borders risks being called racist, except that in the UK it can land you in jail. Over 12,000 people were arrested in 2023 alone for social media posts under UK communications laws, a number that had more than doubled since 2017. In one case, Luke Yarwood received an 18-month sentence for anti-immigration posts on X that had been viewed just 33 times.
    Yusuf has also argued that British citizens’ rights are being placed “beneath those of criminals” under the European Convention on Human Rights, and Reform has pledged to leave the treaty. More broadly, he has described current immigration levels as “unsustainable” for public services.
    Yusuf told reporters that the majority of MI5’s caseload is “Islamist terrorism, so that is a fact,” and accused the government of performing “the most extraordinary gymnastics in order to not actually address the problem.” He pointed to official language in a recent report that used the word “alleged” when describing grooming gang crimes, despite hundreds of convictions.
    “We know there’s been an almighty cover-up,” he said, adding that Labour had acknowledged this only by permitting partial inquiries rather than the full national inquiry Reform is demanding. He accused the government of being willing to “sacrifice the lives of its own people at the altar of this virtue-signalling diversity.”
    Yusuf also invoked the July 2024 Southport attack, in which Axel Rudakubana, a British citizen of Rwandan heritage, stabbed and killed three girls at a dance class: Bebe King, aged six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, aged seven, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, aged nine. He pleaded guilty to murder, attempted murder, possession of terrorist material, and producing ricin.
    Ricin is a highly toxic poison derived from castor beans. It is one of the most dangerous naturally occurring substances and has been used in assassination attempts and terrorist plots. There is no antidote.
    He was sentenced to a minimum of 52 years. Authorities had flagged Rudakubana to the government’s counter-extremism program three times between 2019 and 2021, when he was between 13 and 14 years old.
    Each time, he was assessed and cleared. Yusuf demanded accountability: “Who has been fired? Who has paid a price for this inside the state system? Not a single person funded by the taxpayer whose job it was to keep those little girls alive has paid any penalty.” A subsequent government inquiry found an “inappropriate merry-go-round” of agencies passing responsibility and concluded the culture of unaccountability “has to end.” No one has been fired.
    The grooming-gang prosecutions at the center of this debate involved perpetrators who were overwhelmingly men of Pakistani heritage. Operation Stovewood, the largest such investigation in UK history, identified 323 suspects in Rotherham, nearly two-thirds of Pakistani background, and secured 42 convictions. The Jay Report confirmed most victims were white British girls. The 2025 Baroness Casey audit found the same pattern across Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, and South Yorkshire.
    Convicted perpetrators included Mohammed Amar, Mohammed Siyab, Yasser Ajaibe, Mohammed Zameer Sadiq, Abid Saddiq, Tahir Yassin, and Ramin Bari in Rotherham, and Zahid, Shahzad, Ahmed, Bashir, Khan, Akram, and Hussain in the separate Rochdale prosecutions, which covered crimes committed between 2000 and 2006. The Casey report cautioned that ethnicity data was not recorded for two-thirds of perpetrators nationally, making broader conclusions impossible.
    In the end, American conservatives would see Reform UK’s platform as the kind of common-sense policies held by the Trump administration and that many wish would become enshrined in law in their own country.
    What Yusuf is describing, however, is not current UK law but proposed policy. These measures can only take place if Reform UK wins the next election and Nigel Farage becomes prime minister. Even then, the UK would have to withdraw from international treaties to carry out mass deportations, and that withdrawal could itself be challenged in court, a scenario that will sound familiar to Trump voters who have watched activist judges thwart immigration reform while the clock ticks toward the midterms.
    As bad as things are in the UK, they are worse in the European Union. Meloni in Italy, working within EU constraints, has found that her best efforts to stop the endless flow of migrants have fallen short. Orbán in Hungary defied those constraints and was taken to court by the EU and stripped of billions in funding. However, he managed to keep his country’s borders largely secure but was voted out of office on April 12, 2026, after 16 years in power.
    For now, the situation in the UK serves as a cautionary tale and a teachable moment for Americans on how the left can erode a country and how joining supranational treaties can hamstring government reform.
    The post Illegal Aliens Can Never Get Citizenship, Says UK Spokesman on Immigration and National Security appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • After SPLC Indictment, Democrats Scramble to Defend It as “Politically Motivated” (VIDEO)

    After SPLC Indictment, Democrats Scramble to Defend It as “Politically Motivated” (VIDEO)

    MSNOW’s latest segment offered a clear example of how legacy media handles politically inconvenient stories. Instead of engaging with the substance of a federal indictment, the discussion—featuring Democrat Rep. Dan Goldman—shifted toward deflection, narrative framing, and selective omission.
    The underlying story is not complicated. 
    As previously covered by The Gateway Pundit, a federal grand jury has indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges including wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
    According to prosecutors, the organization allegedly misled donors for nearly a decade—raising funds under the banner of combating extremism while secretly diverting millions of dollars to individuals connected to extremist groups.
    The indictment outlines a detailed pattern. Between 2014 and 2023, more than $3 million in donor funds were allegedly funneled to individuals tied to organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan and Aryan Nations. 
    Donors were not informed. Instead, prosecutors describe the use of fictitious entities and concealed bank accounts to obscure where the money was actually going.
    On MSNOW, however, the focus shifted almost immediately. 
    Rather than addressing the specifics of the indictment, Rep. Goldman emphasized the SPLC’s historical role as a “civil rights” organization and suggested that the case itself is politically motivated.
    That argument sidesteps the central issue. A federal indictment is the result of a grand jury reviewing evidence presented by prosecutors.
    The segment relied heavily on reputation as a substitute for analysis. The SPLC’s past work was repeatedly referenced, while the current allegations were treated as secondary or speculative. That approach creates a disconnect.
    If an organization built its credibility on identifying and exposing misconduct, then allegations of internal financial misconduct should be treated as a serious institutional issue rather than dismissed as partisan noise.
    There was also a noticeable effort to broaden the conversation into unrelated political territory. 
    References to national political divisions, election narratives, and broader ideological disputes diluted the discussion. The effect was clear: move attention away from the details of the indictment and toward a more familiar partisan framework.
    That strategy may work in a television segment. It does not resolve the underlying claims.
    The indictment, led by the FBI with assistance from IRS Criminal Investigation, points to a longer-term structural concern. Prosecutors describe a system in which donor funds were not only misrepresented but also routed through layers of entities designed to avoid detection.
    If proven, that raises questions beyond a single organization. It touches on how nonprofit networks operate, how donor-advised funds are monitored, and how oversight mechanisms function when large sums of money move across loosely regulated channels.
    Public reaction so far has largely treated the case as an isolated controversy. That framing misses the broader implication.
    The alleged conduct spans nearly a decade and involves millions of dollars. That is not a one-off incident—it suggests a system that, at minimum, failed to prevent it.
    None of this establishes guilt. The legal process will determine that.
    But dismissing the case outright, as MSNOW’s segment attempted to do, avoids the central question: whether donor funds were used in ways that directly contradicted the organization’s stated mission.
    MSNOW had an opportunity to examine that question. Instead, the network chose to defend a narrative.
    The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if you subscribed to us there. [HERE]

    The post After SPLC Indictment, Democrats Scramble to Defend It as “Politically Motivated” (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Pope Backfire: Trump’s Support Among Catholics Went Up After Trump Fired Back at Pope Leo

    Pope Backfire: Trump’s Support Among Catholics Went Up After Trump Fired Back at Pope Leo

    Roman Catholic voters are standing by President Donald Trump amid a deep and public spat with Pope Leo XIV, according to recent polling.
    Newsweek examined polls from February, March, and April, during which the pope made public his disapproval of the U.S. war against Iran.
    Continued sniping from the Vatican led Trump to suggest the pope stick to matters of faith and allow American leaders to govern.
    Newsweek used three Fox News polls for its sampling of Roman Catholic opinion. In the first, taken between Feb. 28 and March 2, Roman Catholic voters gave Trump a 52 percent approval rating.
    A poll taken between March 20 and March 23, as the pope was criticizing Trump, showed Trump had a 48 percent approval rating among Roman Catholics.
    But a third poll, conducted between April 17 and April 20, showed Trump with a 51 percent approval rating with Roman Catholics, even after he suggested the pope should rein in his comments.

    IT’S OFFICIAL: President Trump’s approval rating among CATHOLICS just BUMPED several points after his public scuffle with Pope Leo on Iran
    51% of Catholics now approve, per an April Fox poll – and it was previously below that in March
    Trump is following his conscience!… pic.twitter.com/pSMn6Ssb6q
    — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 24, 2026

    White House representative Taylor Rogers suggested Roman Catholics were focused on what Trump was doing for them and not the pope’s commentary.
    “There has never been a greater president for Catholic Americans than President Trump, and his record proves it,” Rogers said in a statement.
    “President Trump ended the weaponization of the federal government against Christians, proudly defended and expanded our religious rights, pardoned pro-life activists, stopped the chemical mutilation of our nation’s children, and protected parents’ rights. The president will never waver in his support for Catholic Americans and will continue delivering unprecedented victories,” she added.
    Newsweek tried to parse the meaning of the poll, suggesting that “institutional authority from the Vatican carries less weight than positions on immigration, national sovereignty, judicial appointments and cultural issues” in the minds of many Roman Catholic voters.
    “Trump’s combative posture toward Pope Leo may therefore register less as an insult to faith and more as resistance to clerical involvement in U.S. policymaking,” Newsweek wrote.
    Newsweek noted that Vice President J.D. Vance, a Roman Catholic, has been forthright in defending Trump, which could sway voters.

    As noted by NBC News, Vance said the pope should “be careful” when assessing U.S. policy.

    The pope has said Jesus “is never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”

    Vance said such a statement does not align with justified wars.

    “Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis? Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated Holocaust camps and liberated those, those innocent people, you know, those who had survived the Holocaust? I certainly think the answer is yes,” he said at a Turning Point USA event.

    Newsweek concluded that “rather than punishing Trump for confronting the Pope, some Catholic voters appear sympathetic to his argument that elected officials, not church leaders, should set U.S. policy.”
    This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
    The post Pope Backfire: Trump’s Support Among Catholics Went Up After Trump Fired Back at Pope Leo appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Sophisticated Theft of 15 Cop-Drones in New Jersey Sparks Bioterrorism Fears

    Sophisticated Theft of 15 Cop-Drones in New Jersey Sparks Bioterrorism Fears

     
    The theft of 15 crop-drones in New Jersey has sparked concerns among the FBI.
    National security news outlet High Side reported that 15 agricultural Ceres Air C31 drones were stolen from a New Jersey warehouse last month.
    According to the report, a man impersonating a delivery driver deceived logistics company CAC International into giving him the fleet of drones.
    The drones have the ability to spray up to 40 gallons of liquid chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers, but authorities are concerned the drones could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons.

    15 chemical spraying drones stolen in NJ as FBI investigates possible ‘nightmare scenario’: report https://t.co/ofuI3B1pg0 pic.twitter.com/NbW4maD6ZM
    — New York Post Metro (@nypmetro) April 25, 2026

    Per Yahoo News:
    Fifteen industrial spray drones vanished from a New Jersey facility last month in what investigators call a sophisticated, coordinated theft. These aren’t hobby quadcopters—they’re precision farming machines capable of dispersing 40 gallons of liquid across 30 acres per flight, all guided by GPS autopilot.
    Federal investigators launched a probe amid bioterrorism concerns, treating the theft as more than expensive equipment loss. Each drone operates as a potential delivery system that could disperse hazardous materials over wide areas without human pilots at risk.
    Retired FBI agent Steve Lazarus warned of serious consequences and called it a concerning scenario, emphasizing these are industrial sprayers designed for precision agriculture, not weekend flying. The sophisticated coordination required suggests professional thieves who understood the equipment’s capabilities and value.
    The theft revives post-September 11th anxieties about agricultural aircraft being weaponized for chemical or biological attacks. Today’s threat multiplies exponentially—instead of recruiting and training pilots for single planes, bad actors could deploy swarms of pre-programmed drones simultaneously.
    The report comes a month after The Gateway Pundit reported that the U.S. Army Fort Campbell Facebook Page revealed that four Skydio X10D Drone Systems were stolen from the 326th Division Engineer Battalion building.
    A spokesperson at Fort Campbell has since announced that the suspects behind the drone theft have been identified, but did not release their names.
    Drone threats have reportedly increased since the United States began military operations in Iran.
    ABC News previously reported that the FBI warned California police departments that Iran may try to attack the West Coast with drones.
    The White House, however, refuted ABC News claims.
    READ:
    JUST IN: Leavitt Fumes, Demands ABC News Immediate Retract Its Report Claiming Iran Planning Drone Attack on California
    /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i

  • Why the Virginia Redistricting Scheme Is Not Even Close to GOP Redistricting

    Why the Virginia Redistricting Scheme Is Not Even Close to GOP Redistricting

    In an interview on MSNOW, DNC Chairman Ken Martin attempted to defend Democrats’ latest redistricting effort in Virginia by framing it as a justified response to Republicans.
    But his argument overlooked the most important fact: what happened in Virginia is fundamentally different from typical redistricting fights in solid red or solid blue states.
    Virginia voters narrowly approved a redistricting referendum, 51.5% to 48.6%, allowing the Democrat-controlled legislature to move forward with a new congressional map.
    The map could give Democrats as many as 10 of Virginia’s 11 congressional seats, a dramatic shift from the current 6–5 Democrat advantage.
    A Virginia judge later blocked certification of the vote, ruling that the measure violated the state constitution and that the ballot language was misleading. The state is expected to appeal.
    That is not a minor technical dispute. It is the core of the issue.
    Virginia already had a redistricting process built around a nonpartisan commission. The state’s current congressional map was not some extreme Republican gerrymander.
    It reflected Virginia’s closely divided electorate, where Democrats and Republicans both have real political strength. That is why the delegation sat near the middle, not at a 10–1 partisan split.
    The new Democrat-backed map would take a competitive swing state and turn its congressional delegation into something that looks nothing like the actual electorate.
    Republicans redistrict in states like Texas and Florida because those states are already reliably Republican. Democrats do the same in places like New York and California.
    Redistricting is political, and both parties use it. But redrawing a swing state mid-cycle to create a near-total partisan advantage crosses a much more serious line.
    Martin did not address that distinction. Instead, he mocked Republicans and claimed Democrats were simply “fighting back.”
    He argued that Republicans started the redistricting fight and that Democrats were not “bringing a pencil to a knife fight.”
    That may be effective television rhetoric, but it does not answer the basic question: why should a swing state with a nearly balanced electorate be turned into a map where one party could control almost every congressional seat?
    Democrats cannot claim to be defending democracy while pushing a map that could reduce Republican representation in Virginia to one seat out of 11.
    They cannot insist redistricting is dangerous when Republicans do it, then celebrate when Democrats use the same tool more aggressively in a state where the consequences are far greater.
    The hypocrisy is obvious.
    A fair map in a swing state should reflect the voters who live there. Virginia is not California. It is not New York. It is not a deep-blue state where Democrats naturally dominate every region.
    Rather, Virginia is a competitive state, and its congressional map should reflect that competition.
    Instead, Democrats pushed a plan that could wipe out most Republican representation while calling it democracy.
    That is the real story from Martin’s MSNOW interview. The DNC chairman did not defend fairness.
    He defended a political maneuver designed to give Democrats more seats, more control, and a better chance of taking back the House.
    Republicans should call it exactly what it is: a Democrat power grab in one of the most important swing states in the country.

    The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if you subscribed to us there. [HERE]

    The post Why the Virginia Redistricting Scheme Is Not Even Close to GOP Redistricting appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao Releases Statement After John Phelan Ousted (VIDEO)

    Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao Releases Statement After John Phelan Ousted (VIDEO)

    Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao released a video statement after John Phelan was ousted from the position.
    As previously reported, Secretary of the Navy, John Phelan on was fired by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on Wednesday.
    Undersecretary Hung Cao is now the Acting Secretary of the Navy, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell announced.
    Full statement from Sean Parnell:
    Secretary of the Navy John C. Phelan is departing the administration, effective immediately.
    On behalf of the Secretary of War and Deputy Secretary of War, we are grateful to Secretary Phelan for his service to the Department and the United States Navy.
    We wish him well in his future endeavors.
    Undersecretary Hung Cao will become Acting Secretary of the Navy.
    At first it was unclear if John Phelan was fired or resigned but Fox News later reported that he was indeed fired.
    On Thursday, President Trump’s statement suggested Phelan departed on his own accord.
    Full statement from President Trump:
    John Phelan is a long time friend, and very successful businessman, who did an outstanding job serving as my Secretary Of The Navy for the last year.
    John helped my Administration rebuild Sleepy Joe Biden’s rapidly depleted, and almost abandoned, Navy. Now, because of John, and all of the Great Men and Women lovingly and tirelessly involved, we have the strongest Navy in the World — BY FAR!
    John Phelan is smart, tough, and respected by all, and although he has decided to move on from his position as Secretary Of The Navy, I very much appreciate the job that he has done, and would certainly like to have him back within the Trump Administration sometime in the future.
    A very special thank you to John for his service to the United States of America! President DONALD J. TRUMP
    Later Thursday, President Trump said Phelan had conflicts with some people.
    “He’s a very good man.. He’s a hard charger, and he had some conflicts with some other people, mostly as to building and buying new ships,” Trump said.
    “I’m very aggressive in the new shipbuilding, amd somehow he just didn’t get along with them,” he said.
    Hung Cao released a video statement on Saturday.
    WATCH:
    !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4ni4cs”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”);

    Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v76tcy4″,”div”:”rumble_v76tcy4″});
    The post Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao Releases Statement After John Phelan Ousted (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • MORE TROUBLE FOR SWALWELL: Allegedly Used Campaign Cash to Pay Lawyer Representing Him Against Sexual Misconduct Accusations

    MORE TROUBLE FOR SWALWELL: Allegedly Used Campaign Cash to Pay Lawyer Representing Him Against Sexual Misconduct Accusations

    The hits just keep coming for disgraced former Congressman Eric Swalwell.
    In addition to facing multiple accusations of sexual misconduct and even rape, he is now facing allegations that he used campaign cash to pay a lawyer representing him in these matters. He also reportedly used campaign cash to pay babysitters.
    And we’re not talking about small amounts here. We’re talking about tens of thousands of dollars.
    The Washington Free Beacon reports:
    Eric Swalwell Campaign Paid $40K to Lawyer Representing Him Against Sexual Misconduct Allegations, $22K for Babysitters
    Disgraced former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) dipped into his gubernatorial campaign’s war chest to pay an attorney representing him against sexual assault charges and for babysitters for his three children, records show.
    According to campaign filings released Thursday, Swalwell’s campaign paid $40,000 to Sara Azari, a veteran criminal defense attorney who specializes in “cases where liberty, livelihood, and reputation are at stake.” It is Swalwell’s first payment to Azari; he has typically relied on other lawyers. Azari is representing the former congressman against allegations that he sexually assaulted a former congressional aide and harassed staffers.
    The Manhattan district attorney’s office opened an investigation on April 11 after a former aide alleged that Swalwell sexually assaulted her while she was inebriated after a political event in 2024. The same woman accused Swalwell of raping her while she was drunk in 2019. Swalwell suspended his gubernatorial campaign the same day and resigned from Congress on April 14.
    In a statement before the ex-congressman’s resignation, Azari said Swalwell “categorically” denied the assault and harassment allegations, calling them a “calculated and transparent political hit job.” Azari said Swalwell would “pursue every available legal remedy” against his accusers.
    Swalwell, who was the frontrunner in the governor’s race before the scandal, also relied heavily on campaign funds to take care of his three children. According to campaign disclosures, Team Swalwell paid around $22,549 in 12 transactions to Swalwell’s longtime nanny, Amanda Barbosa, between January 1 and April 18.
    At this point, he will be lucky to stay out of prison.
    By the way, have you noticed that the liberal media is no longer interested in talking about Swalwell anymore?

    Can I read about this in the Washington Post? Kind of weird how a good majority of mainstream reporting just stopped now that he’s out of the California Governor’s race. https://t.co/m1WYlUOYi5
    — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) April 24, 2026

    Isn’t that interesting?
    The post MORE TROUBLE FOR SWALWELL: Allegedly Used Campaign Cash to Pay Lawyer Representing Him Against Sexual Misconduct Accusations appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.